It looks like from a post on Namepros some might be concerned that Namesilo (an advertiser here) has taken the name BreonnaTaylor.com and is redirecting the name to a GoFundMe page for Breonna’s family. Namesilo will be donating $10,000.
I have reached out for a statement and will update if and when I get one.
WNKY.com reported on the domain here
Namesilo made the following statement in an email to me and on Namepros.
Thank you to all the community members who took time to research the facts of the situation prior to reaching any conclusions.To summarize – we received numerous reports about the domain name breonnataylor.com. Following an investigation, we found it was indeed inciting violence and unlawful behavior against the police department that had nothing to do with the domain, so we decided to take it down per our T&Cs. In an already tense situation, leaving up the domain name would have been irresponsible and only serve to create further anger and pain.To help ease some of the damage done, we decided to instead forward the domain name to support the GoFundMe of Breonna Taylor’s family, along with a 10k donation. We are currently trying to get in touch with Breonna’s family and offer them access to the domain name. Otherwise, we will deactivate the domain again once the GoFundMe campaign is completed.We hope you will stand with us in supporting Breonna Taylor’s family and the Black community dealing with these injustices.
lifesavings.online says
Namesilo, I’m sure, has close ties with namepros, if not one and the same. Good luck getting to the bottom of that over there. The shill army will be in full force regarding this. I am sure ‘commandeering’ a domain for registar profit is against some ICANN rule. Don’t think they own the domains in any regard. They are just technical intermediaries overstepping their liberties IMO. If they don’t delete the domain, they are breaking a rule called ‘warehousing’. Don’t expect ICANN to enforce their own rules though. Your industry is so far gone – out of control. If true, what namesilo is doing is despicable.
Raymond Hackney says
Most registrars have in their TOS they can take a domain name back
SERVICES PROVIDED AT WILL; TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION OF SERVICES:
We may reject your domain name registration application or elect to discontinue providing Services to you for any reason within 30 days of a Service initiation or a Service renewal. Outside of this period, we may terminate or suspend the Services at any time for cause, which, without limitation, includes (i) registration of prohibited domain name(s), (ii) abuse of the Services, (iii) payment irregularities, (iv) illegal conduct, (v) failure to keep your Account or WHOIS information accurate and up to date, (vi) failure to respond to inquiries from us for over three (3) calendar days, (vii) if your use of the Services involves us in a violation of any third party’s rights or acceptable use policies, including but not limited to the transmission of unsolicited email, the violation of any copyright, or the distribution of any form of malware (defined to include, without limitation, malicious code or software that might affect the operation of the Internet), (viii) to comply with any applicable court orders, laws, government rules or requirements, requests of law enforcement or other governmental agency or organization, or any dispute resolution process, (ix) to avoid any liability, civil or criminal, on the part of us, as, well as its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, and employees, (x) to protect the integrity, security and stability of the Domain Name system (DNS), or (xi) failure to respond to inquiries from us regarding payment inquiries for over 24 hours.
Prohibited domain names and illegal activities which may be subject to these provisions include, but are not limited to:
Domains and web sites prohibited by the laws of the United States and/or foreign territories in which you conduct business
Domains and web sites designed to encourage unlawful behavior by others, such as hate crimes, terrorism and child pornography
Domains and web sites that are tortious or invasive of the privacy of a third party
Domains and web sites designed to harm or use unethically minors in any way
Domains and web sites engaging in, promoting or facilitating phishing attacks
Domains and web sites involved in the transmission of unsolicited email
Domains and web sites involved in unauthorized repetitive, high volume inquires into any of the services provided by us or a third-party
Domains and web sites involved in copyright and/or trademark infringement
Domains transferred illegally from a different registrar without the previous Registrant’s knowledge
REFUNDS WILL NOT BE ISSUED IF YOUR SERVICES ARE SUSPENDED FOR CAUSE PER THIS AGREEMENT.
THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO REFUNDS FOR BITCOIN PURCHASES.
If we determine that your account is engaged in repeated abuse of this Agreement then we may elect to terminate your entire account and all domains within your account.
You may cancel any domain registration (other than domains registered via drop-catching) with us within three (3) days of purchase for a full refund (minus any applicable transaction fees). You may cancel at any time after the three-day period, but no refund will be issued. To cancel a domain name, please log in to your account and visit the Order History page. Your refund will be issued back to the method of payment used to make the registration purchase. The total refund amount may be reduced by any transaction fees that we incurred as part of the initial transaction and/or the issuance of the refund. All refunds will go back to the source of the transaction.
Important note regarding domain registration refunds. At our sole discretion, we may choose not to issue a domain registration refund if we believe you to be engaged in “domain tasting” or some other activity resulting in an abnormal number of cancellations. More specifically, if, in our sole discretion, we believe you to be engaged in a high volume or irregular number of registrations and subsequent cancellations, we may opt not to refund your money. In the event we believe you to be engaged in such activity, we will make an effort to issue one warning via email to you prior to disallowing further refunds for your account, but we are not obligated to do so.
You may cancel domain renewals (other than renewals associated with Expired Domain Auctions) with us within three (3) days of purchase for a full refund (minus any applicable transaction fees). If you transfer your domain within 45 days of a domain renewal, you may not be entitled to a refund and you may also not receive any extended registration time on your domain. ALL DOMAIN RENEWAL CANCELLATIONS, OTHER THAN CERTAIN AUTOMATIC RENEWALS, WILL RESULT IN YOUR DOMAIN BEING DELETED AND PLACED INTO THE REDEMPTION PERIOD AT THE REGISTRY. THIS MEANS THAT YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RENEW THE DOMAIN WITH US WITHOUT PAYING FOR A RESTORATION, OR POSSIBLY NOT AT ALL. IF YOU HAVE TIME REMAINING ON YOUR REGISTRATION IT WILL BE SACRIFICED IN TOTAL WHEN RECEIVING A RENEWAL REFUND.
Important note regarding domain renewal refunds. At our sole discretion, we may choose not to issue a domain renewal refund if your cancellation rate surpasses the ratios set by our system.
Sorry, but refunds are not available for restorations, completed transfers, Sedo premium domains, Afternic premium domains, domain auctions and marketplace purchases or Bitcoin purchases.
If we terminate or suspend the Services provided to you under this Agreement, we may then, at our option, make either ourselves or a third party the beneficiary of Services which are substantially similar to those which were previously provided to you. If we have grounds to terminate or suspend Services with respect to one domain name or in relation to other Services provided through your Account, we may terminate or suspend all Services provided through your Account. No fee refund will be made when there is a suspension or termination of Services for cause.
Raymond Hackney says
Important to note, If we terminate or suspend the Services provided to you under this Agreement, we may then, at our option, make either ourselves or a third party the beneficiary of Services which are substantially similar to those which were previously provided to you.
lifesavings.online says
Well I can’t find new info on warehousing being ‘against’ the rules. Just that icann kicks the can and domainers hate the practice. Either way, none of those in this industry ‘work for you’. It’s still so out of control, obviously. If namesilo did this, im sure there will be renewed outrage. Nothing gets done.
Raymond Hackney says
Well as I linked to in the article, there is a Kentucky website saying that where the domain was pointing to was not a charity website they had anything to do with setting up.
lifesavings.online says
Oh I looked at wayback and saw what was recorded june 1-2. Didn’t see anything illegal but that’s IMO.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200601225307/https://breonnataylor.com/
Seems to me, namesilo simply didn’t like how it was being used.
Also interesting, whois shows the date registered was 1 day BEFORE she was killed. Could be a timezone thing, but if WIKI is right she died on 5-13 (-4 GMT). Domain registered 5-12. Not sure how besides some timezone thing.
lifesavings.online says
It is strange about the KY websites (one .gov). https://web.archive.org/web/20200531041536/https://saferlouisville.org/ (also down)
https://saferlouisville.org is offline too. It was the 3rd donation link. That could have been the scam. Not very relevant regardless.
Sad it was used the way it was, to support some KY stuff, maybe some scam.
Also sad that namesilo choose to parade the domain around themselves. It doesn’t matter if they how they ‘use it’ IMO. How are we going to trust they are any more ‘legitimate’ in collecting donations than anyone else (except her family)? We’re just supposed to trust them, because why?
I see it as a social grandstanding publicity stunt and an abuse of their position in order to virtue signal. A lot of important questions. It’s great to do nice things…but did anyone in her family ASK them? Seems to me they are taking a lot of unnecessary liberties (given their underlying business) which leads to a slippery slope.
Is this the new normal now? Are registars going to take over domains and put them to ‘better’ use than the original registrant? They are the arbiters of social justice? How many times will this be allowed to happen? How safe are our domains?…registars are beginning to figure out how valuable a good domain might be. Perhaps they believe you are ‘misusing’ them, and they are better suited to develop it in spite of you?
Snoopy says
I can understand the domain getting seized but Namesilo putting up their own site and then deciding how the name should be used is very inappropriate.
What happens if Verisign decided to seize CoronaVirus.com because GoDaddy have it pointing to the WHO (which the US government believe is strongly China affiliated) and replace it with their own content?
Since when is it ok for a registrar/registry to make a decision based on content then replace it with what they believe is the right content and become the operator of that site?
Raymond Hackney says
I believe for the “since when” part it’s in the TOS.
But Namesilo had another option, every registrar states
You agree that (INSERT REGISTRAR), in its sole discretion and without liability to you, may refuse to accept the registration of any domain name. INSERT REGISTRAR also may in its sole discretion and without liability to you delete the registration of any domain name during the first thirty (30) days after registration has taken place.
So they could delete it for any reason, then register it for the Taylor family. Domain is less than 30 days old.
Snoopy says
I’m guessing they see far more PR mileage in taking it for themselves and promoting the domain and their “good deed”.
SAKTHIMICRO says
Exactly Raymond Hackney Sir,
Thatβs Register Decision,
James Bieniek says
Everyone wants to be a domainer. Registries, registars. They want their cake and eat ours too. They are allowed to take our domains and use them for themselves at their discretion. Registrars should not be allowed to use customer-registered domains for their own uses, ever, in any regard! It is a fundamentally flawed idea, there will be a long-term result.
What will happen (however long it takes), they will become bolder and brazen, taking valuable domains on whatever grounds they conjure up, just to monetize them themselves. Hate to say it, that’s how things end up. Call it a theory if you want, but these type of lawless structure ALWAYS end up making a power grab for more $. More $ is their sole MO. They could give a fk about the little guys whom they are supposed to serve.
ICANN is totally complacent in allowing them to parade around with these ‘civil asset forfeitures’. It’s like a slap in the face to investors!
Gagul says
Start your own registrar, piece of cake π
NameSilo says
To address some of your concerns – this was very much an isolated situation, so any concerns of us arbitrarily seizing domain names from registrants are completely false.
We have no intention to keep this domain name either but the situation was volatile and we needed to be responsible. The domain was circulating across different media and incorrectly implicating police involvement and ownership, so it became a matter of public safety as well. Our T&Cs were indeed broken, but above all, we wanted to demonstrate basic morality and decency to a grieving family.