Many times over the years someone will try to pinpoint the % of the .com value in .net and .org. While there is no formula and plenty of outlier sales distort the data set, this week we have a look at a one word, common English name in .com, .net and .org.
Dispute.com was regged 22 years ago, with the .net and .org following one year later.
Dispute.net closed on Wednesday at $2,275.
Dispute.org closed today at $5,050.
The bidding action on the .org:
|
The .com is currently at $50,000.
Leonard Britt says
Dispute.Top the name has expired…
Rick Schwartz says
Great comparison!
Those that don’t want to see it will never see it. The numbers don’t lie. Not only are the values a very small fraction of the.com, the demand is 1/1000. Many, maybe even the majority of domainers failed to factor that in to their equation. So they waste their time, their money and their energy instead of focusing on the gold and they make squats. Then they wonder why they can’t pay for the renewals.
You can sell Mercedes that are in very high demand and are high-quality or you can sell Yugo’s which fall apart and become worthless. Same time, same energy except one has no reward. The other has great reward.
ss says
.org continues to hold value as .net continues to fall. for the right word like ‘dispute’, a .org makes total sense. whereas .net is losing relevancy with so many cctld and new gtld alternatives. the auction for dispute.com isn’t over yet, but i’m impressed with the selling price of dispute.org. for my best .com’s, i always try to secure the .org as well.
that said, if i were an end-user launching a brand today, i’d use .com, even get___.com if needed. it’s been popular to use .co and .io, but i’d still prefer using ___app.com if the ___.app could be acquired as well.
Snoopy says
.org hasn’t done well either. It sells even worse to endusers overall. Turd!
Stella says
.org is the best.