So GoDaddy revamped their appraisal tool and now when someone is bidding at GoDaddy auctions they see where GoDaddy is valuing the name.
Elliot Silver wrote a couple articles on the topic. On Twitter and as a sidenote in the Daily Sales Recap on TLDinvestors.com I expressed my doubts about this.
@DInvesting @godaddyauctions I think it hurts GoDaddy more than helps if worthless names have $1,000 + values attached. Just my opinion.
— TLD Investors (@TLDInvestors) May 12, 2017
So now tonight I am reading a thread on Namepros where a member points out seemingly worthless names getting a bid, early into the auction process.
It turns out these names all have appraised values over $1,000.
Fanninmn.com valued at $1,458? This name certainly does not have that kind of value. Now in the past there were some high valuations on seemingly worthless names, the one difference was GoDaddy was showing traffic of say 10,000 +. This listing shows traffic of 2!
DONGWWW.com valued at $1,535
CMKMG.com valued at $1,374
Darubazz.com valued at $1,074
MBUCD.com valued at $1,121
Of course this is just a random sample, I just think it makes GoDaddy look like they don’t understand valuations.
If an industry outsider is first introduced to domaining by reviewing GoDaddy auctions and seeing these valuations, it’s the wrong first impression.
SK says
i agree.sure they don’t understand valuations.hehehhehehehehe..
Hassan says
Valuation can never be done with software tools. These are just guesses.
Mark Thorpe says
It definitely needs to be tweaked.
Imran says
Darubazz.com is a hindi language word. It is valued correctly by GoDaddy account at $1074.
The same could by applicable with other names. The names could have regional meaning. They maybe some kind of abbreviations.
As per the author GoDaddy does not understand valuations. This is a wrong statement. I advise you to reconsider your own valuation methods
Raymond Hackney says
I advise you to know what you are talking about. The word Darubazz is not correctly valued, the name is actually available in the Indian extension .in and every other extension.
The Hindi word with meaning is actually Darubaaz https://www.google.com/search?q=darubazz&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=darubaaz+meaning
The other is Darubaz not Darubazz http://dict.hinkhoj.com/darubaz-meaning-in-hindi.words
And on top of that there are no experts at GoDaddy providing valuations based off of Hindi language.
Google translate Hindi to English shows nothing https://translate.google.com/#hi/en/darubazz
The other examples listed are not even words, Fanninmn would seem to me to be Fannin a last name and Minnesota the abbreviation for the state of Minnesota.
Anonymous says
CMKMG.com is a five-letter CHIP.
According to namebio, similar names like:
ymjdm.com sold for $1,269 on 2015-06-03
mnjhl.com sold for $1,480 on 2015-07-24
John says
https://www.thedomains.com/2012/11/02/marchexs-sales-prove-it-estibot-appraisals-are-worthless/
Jon Schultz says
That’s a great article with many great comments.
While some of the metrics which Estibot and other automated appraisal tools show are good to know, it takes an intelligent human mind to understand the potential value of a domain in advertising.
John says
Great how Rick Schwartz kicks off the comments there, ay?
Quebecer says
GoDaddy has no clue on valuation, think they got the same prices for MWD domains that Berkens did or would ?
Mike says
I think it will be counterproductive and wont achieve any increased revenue for GoDaddy just more disgruntled buyers who find they have bought a “lemon” on basis of a valuation .
slapdude says
the valuations are worthless… IMO. scrap them.
Eric Lyon says
It looks like they are trying to follow Mike Mann’s evaluation strategy (Price everything high, to inject the industry with a value standard and eliminate the nickel & dime sales). Which appears to be backfiring on Go Daddy at the moment. Automation was the wrong approach.
John says
No, the problem is always the opposite in my experience. That’s why I’m so against it.
Just sayin says
Seems a little self serving for a company to tell you something is worth $1,000 while offering it to you for sale. Especially junk names. Makes you wonder if there is a potential liability issue there with offering such faulty “valuations” to consumers?…
cmac says
no point even looking at the valuations..they are sooo off the mark.
AverageDomains says
That dude ^ who thinks Godaddy knows how to appraise lmao! Hahahah! Godaddy should make their employees submit what they think a domain is worth, and take the average. Will be interesting to see what Mike Mann’s future appraisal system will be like, most likely more accurate than anything out there.
John says
Literally just now this happened to appear as I was perusing Google News. How long before this happens for domains:
Homeowner sues Zillow, says ‘Zestimate’ is nonsense
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/real-estate-news/article149337129.html
John says
Follow the money…
“The Zestimate feature is the cornerstone of Zillow’s business model since it pulls in millions of home shoppers, allowing the company to sell advertising space to realty agents. Zillow makes big money with the help of its Zestimates”
John says
Rick’s words from November 2012 bear repeating now:
“These services do DAMAGE to domineers. they don’t help them.”
And here is the whole quote:
“Mike,
As I have stated for years….ALL domain appraisals are worthless. Period.
They are based on bullshit which in my opinion makes them for AMUSEMENT ONLY and should be labeled as such.
I am trying really hard not to use the word SCAM. But it always seems to be the first word that comes to mind whenever I hear somebody say “Domain Appraisal”. The others include “Rookies”, and “Desperate”. I won’t even answer an email that MENTIONS an appraisal. The minute ANYONE touts an appraisal, in the garbage it goes. These services do DAMAGE to domineers. they don’t help them. These are based on NONSENSE with info fed into them by folks with limited knowledge of what makes domain names valuable to begin with.” (Rick Schwartz, TheDomains.com, November 2, 2012 at 10:57 am)