Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Awards
  • Privacy Policy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
TheDomains.com

FF.com sold for $1.4 million and the broker is suing for their commission

February 6, 2017 by Raymond Hackney

There is a very interesting story about FF.com on Jalopnik.com. The article deals with the broker of FF.com not getting paid their 15% commission. Hat tip to George Kirikos. Looking at Domain Tools the seller was Bank of America.

In November, a 10-page complaint was filed against Faraday in San Francisco County Superior Court by a company that essentially acts as a broker for acquiring domain names. The filing describes what seems to be the genesis of how FF wound up with its name, as well as the company’s website, and pins a $210,000 claim on the start-up for allegedly failing to pay the broker, Domains Cable, a commission for the deal to purchase FF.com.

The complaint asks for economic damages in an “amount to be proven at trial but not less than $210,000, representing a 15 percent commission on the $1,400,000 transaction,” along with miscellaneous costs and expenses of the suit.

A spokesperson for Faraday told Jalopnik “we do not comment on litigation matters.” The company, in a brief response filed last month in court, denied the allegations and asked a judge to dismiss the complaint and enter a judgment in favor of FF.

Read the full story here

Share
Share on Facebook
Share
Share this
Share
Share on Google Plus

Filed Under: Domain Sales, Domains

About Raymond Hackney

Raymond is a writer, domain trader and consultant based in Pennsylvania. Raymond is the founder of 3Character.com and TLDInvestors.com.

« PIR Releases 2017 Global NGO Online Technology Report: 92% of NGO’s Have a Website
Rightside lowered to a sell rating by Zacks Research shares below $8 »

Comments

  1. Rich says

    February 6, 2017 at 11:12 pm

    $210,000 to broker a deal like this i think personally it’s more like a partner not a broker.

    • Anonymous says

      February 7, 2017 at 12:47 am

      Seems pretty standard to me. B of A was asking $2.5MM and he got them to come down $1.0MM. He was well worth his commission. In the words of Teddy K.G.B., “Pay that man his money.”

  2. Richard says

    February 7, 2017 at 4:32 am

    Pathetic. Tbe company behind FF has tens of millions in funding. What is it with these guys?

  3. Josh says

    February 7, 2017 at 7:07 am

    FF is perhaps a shame, the world is still waiting to see. Their validity changes like the wind, not sure if real or not 😉

  4. Andrea Paladini says

    February 7, 2017 at 8:42 am

    How comes they didn’t get paid their fees? Didn’t they use an escrow service to finalize the transaction? 🙂

    • Andrea Paladini says

      February 7, 2017 at 10:23 am

      Just noticed the full article … 🙂
      Broker circumvention is totally unacceptable, that’s why we always suggest to ask the client to sign a written brokerage agreement.
      There may be a (very) few exceptions when there is strong reciprocal trust between longtime friends or business partners, but putting things in writing is always the best option to protect your work and to avoid costly and time-consuming lawsuits.

  5. Josh says

    February 7, 2017 at 9:17 am

    Rajwani got screwed, no doubt.

    On a side note I tried buying this for several hundred thousand years ago with not even a reply. Timing is everything.

    • Snoopy says

      February 7, 2017 at 7:14 pm

      Not sure that is about timing, it is about contacting the right people in an organisation.

  6. STRIKER says

    February 7, 2017 at 9:25 am

    Ballers get paid up-front

  7. Bill Sweetman says

    February 7, 2017 at 2:04 pm

    I hope this broker gets the money he is due however I’m surprised he didn’t have a formal, written brokerage contract with his client, especially given the huge dollars at stake. As a full-time domain buyer broker, I won’t pursue a domain on behalf of a client without the client signing our standard buyer brokerage contract, which of course includes a non-circumvention clause and other clauses to protect us.

  8. Michael Berkens says

    February 8, 2017 at 7:52 am

    I don;t know who at BOA pulled the trigger at $1.4M remember this domain was sold during the height of China Market surge in 2015.

    Even the asking price of just $2.1 million seemed quite low especially back in that day.


Recent Articles

  • The Greatest Domain Stories of all time – Part 1
  • Sedo weekly domain name sales led by Borj.com
  • Godaddy earnings beat by $0.13, revenue topped estimates

Recent Comments

  • John on The Greatest Domain Stories of all time – Part 1
  • Francois on Rick Schwartz details every domain he has acquired since 2022
  • Zip on Rick Schwartz details every domain he has acquired since 2022
  • John on Rick Schwartz details every domain he has acquired since 2022
  • John on Rick Schwartz gives positive remarks on new domain appraisal tool

Categories

Archives

Copyright ©2025 TheDomains.com