A one member UDRP panel just handed over the domain name KnowHowInsurance.com, to the trademark holder of “Know How”
The Complainant registered the domain name KnowHow.com on June 22, 1995; knowhow.co.uk January 14, 1997, and knowhowmovies.com on June 27, 2011.
The UK trade mark of KNOWHOW was registered on January 21, 2011, for goods in class 9, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40 and 42, under number UK00002557010.
The UDRP panel expanded the trademark holders rights to include other words in domain with “Know How” which is a pretty generic term so a troubling decision I think.
The Complainant is the holder of the UK registered trade mark KNOWHOW.
The Disputed Domain name consists of the word “knowhow” with the addition of the generic word “insurance” and the gTLD “.com”. According to well-established consensus among UDRP panels, the gTLD is not distinguishing.
The Panel finds that the Complainant’s KNOWHOW trade mark is the distinctive part of the disputed Domain Name, and the addition of the generic word “insurance” is not sufficient to avoid Internet users’ confusion in relation to the trade mark. The added word “insurance” is more likely to increase confusion to customers because of its close association with connections to the Complainant’s business.
Consequently, the Panel finds the disputed Domain Name to be confusingly similar to the trade mark in which the Complainant has rights. The first element of the paragraph 4(a) of the Policy is thus fulfilled.
The disputed Domain Name was registered approximately seventeen years after the registration date of the Complainant’s domain name <knowhow.com> and one year after the registration date of the UK trade mark KNOWHOW.
The Complainant’s formal notification was delivered to the Respondent on August 15, 2012. The Respondent has not rebutted the Complainant’s contentions. The word “knowhow” is distinctive and protectable in relation to, inter alia, insurance. It is not probable that the Respondent has selected the disputed Domain Name including the trade mark KNOWHOW without knowledge of the Complainant’s trade mark.
Having regarded the facts of this case, it is in the Panel’s view apparent that the disputed Domain Name was registered with knowledge of the Complainant’s trade mark rights and with the intention of attracting customers for commercial gain by creating a likelihood of confusion with that same mark as to the source, affiliation, or endorsement of the Respondent’s website. All in all, the Panel finds that the disputed Domain Name has been registered and used in bad faith. The third and final element of the Policy is fulfilled.
For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed Domain Name <knowhowinsurance.com> be transferred to the Complainant.
cmac says
i don’t see how ‘knowhow’ can even really be trademarked let alone this decision in effect saying they have rights to every domain beginning with ‘knowhow’.
BrianWick says
3 panelists probably would have decided differenlt
johnuk says
@cmac Exactly. But if anyone sends me $750 and the name they want a trade mark for I can get them one “the” “know how” “this” “yes” etc etc etc anything at all ,depending on the parameters.
johnuk says
Maybe some should register “insurance” as a trade mark and then issue UDRP against the Complainant.
gypsumfantastic says
I’m from the UK and I thought Know How was merely Currys/PC World’s own goods delivery service.
So KnowHowInsurance.com could be relevant to an insurance business in the USA without it impacting on Currys/PC World.
So the only case I could see where this ruling was fair is if the respondent is UK based and was hosting site which was leeching off of the complainant’s Know How brand.
johnuk says
I have just done a bit of digging. I wont paste all the TM here but the complainant does have an “Image”/graphic TM for “knowhow” that does cover the services etc of “Insurance” .The relevant dates are;
Filing date 24 August 2010 Date of entry in register 21 January 2011 Renewal date
24 August 2020
Now I see also, interestingly, that they registered the .co.uk of this UDRP .com in July 2013 AND in September 2013 have filed a CTM application which also now includes the word “Insurance” (in other words the same as UK TM plus the addition of word “insurance” . THIS means they have in effect said by this CTM application that the UK one they used to win the UDRP is NOT sufficient to enforce !.
I do hope they Respondent takes to Court.