Its been just over two years since the .Co TLD launched and we reached out to Nicolai Bezsonoff, the Chief Operating Officer of .CO Internet, SAS the company that operates the .Co ccTLD to see if we could get some solid numbers on renewal rates and registrations.
Not only did we get numbers but we got an interview with Nicolai.
By way of background Nicolai has been with the company since its inception, and was responsible for the transition of the TLD and its successful launch.
Apart from playing a key role defining the company’s corporate strategy, he oversees every aspect of it’s operations, with the primary responsibility of ensuring a secure and reliable experience of the .CO domain to users, customers, and partners.
His claim to fame: 100% uptime… after lots of coffee.
Nicolai brings more than 16 years of experience in technology, operations and product development.
Originally from Colombia, Nicolai was the Director of Technology and Operations for Citigroup in their New York headquarters. In that role he was responsible for defining the technological strategy for the commercial, corporate, and investment banking divisions of the bank – overseeing a large team in New York, London, São Paulo, and Mumbai. Prior to that he held senior roles for Zefer Consulting and Cambridge Technology Partners providing technology strategy and advisory services to global 1000 firms.
Nicolai holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Miami (Yeah, Juan), as well as an MBA from Columbia University and London Business School.
Nicolai It’s been just over two years since the launch of .CO, how is the extension faring?
“Yes, we just celebrated our second birthday.
As it turns out, the “Twos” aren’t so terrible after all.
We’re making solid headway with our target audience, which is focused on startups and growing businesses worldwide.
We’re also seeing more registrations, more great use cases and more excitement about the extension than we had ever expected. The momentum is very strong. (Note: .CO released an Infographic a few months ago that gives a summary of .CO’s progress to date).
What are the metrics you use to measure your success?
That’s a great question – and one we spend a huge amount of time considering every day. There’s no quick or simple answer, as it turns out. We look at several different metrics, starting with development. First and foremost, we look for use cases by companies in our target market. To do that, among other things, we created an index of startup accelerators, incubators, and specific media outlets that reach that market. From there, we look at how many sites in .CO are being mentioned and compare against previous periods. That gives us a good sense of how things are progressing.
Although a bit less interesting, we also look at the raw number of domain names registered each year, each month and each day – right down to the minute.
Currently we’ve got over 1.35 million domain names registered by people and businesses around the world, largely in the US and Europe.
We also measure and monitor the performance of .CO as compared to all the other domain extensions on the secondary market.
High secondary market values are often thought to be indicative of a strong domain extension.
We were very happy to see the results of Sedo’s recent market study that found that .CO has the second highest average sales prices of all top domain extensions in the Sedo marketplace — second only to .com.
As the .CO extension becomes more widely adopted, developed, monetized and marketed – we think the secondary market for .CO domains will only grow stronger.
What about renewals? How is .CO performing on that front?
Renewal rates are definitely another key metric we track and monitor closely. We’re now knee deep in our second cycle of renewals – so we’ve been busy analyzing the data. Knock on wood, so far so good.
I think the best way to look at the data is to separate our pre-launch from our post-launch renewal rates.
As we expected, the pre-launch renewal rates are exceptionally high.
This includes domain names acquired during the Grandfather, Sunrise and Landrush phases of our launch process – which took place just prior to our public launch on July 20th, 2010, known as “General Availability”(“GA”).
For domain names acquired after GA, when the general public could register .CO domain names on a first come first serve basis, the renewal rate is still very high — but it’s much more in line with industry standards.
So what exactly are the renewal rates?
For domain names registered pre-GA, renewal rates range from 92% – 97%.
Domains acquired during the Grandfather phase have a 97% renewal rate
Domains acquired during the Sunrise phase have a 96% renewal rate;
Domains acquired during the Landrush phase have a 92% renewal rate.
For domain names acquired after GA, the blended rate of renewal is 62%, which includes the average of first and second time renewals.
Second time renewals are particularly strong, with an average renewal rate of 72%.
Wow, I don’t think I have ever gotten such specific numbers from any registry on renewal rates, you should be really happy with those numbers:
Yes, we’re very happy. The numbers are strong — especially when you consider that they don’t account for multi-year registrations.
When we report renewal rates to the public, we typically don’t consider multi-year registrations – we just look at renewals made by those who have the ability to opt to renew in a given year. Unfortunately, this tends to drag the percentages down a bit because it excludes all of those committed registrants who opted to register their domain names for 2 to 5 year terms in advance.
Internally we do monitor and measure multi-year registrations, as it allows us to track the total number of domains under management registered in a month against the total number of domain names not renewed for that particular month. Using this method we end up with an 80.3% renewal rate– which is super strong.
It’s also important to remember that .CO is a very young registry, and renewal rates will tend to trend upwards over time. It’s a fact that the longer someone owns a particular domain name, the more likely they are to renew that domain name over time. That’s why we see our second time renewal rate is so much higher than our blended first and second year rate. I’m confident we’ll continue to see upward momentum next year – and that our third time renewal rate will be substantially higher still.
There’s been a lot of speculation about the number of “drops” .CO would see following your second anniversary. Can you give us the details?
So the numbers are in and counted – and the drops were, as they say, “nothing to write home about.” For July-September of 2012, the three months where we expected to have the highest drops of the year (by far), the actual numbers were less than predicted — and were far outweighed by the number of new registrations. Despite all the speculation, our zone file has not gotten any lighter at all. ”
“We’re now at over 1.35 million domains under management and the extension has never been stronger.”
Can you share the actual number of dropped .Co Domain Names?
“Sorry Mike, I’m afraid I can’t give the specifics. The data would be far too valuable to our competitors (current and future). The only folks with access to that information are our closest partners who have access to our zone file on a daily basis.”
What’s next for .CO?
“We’ve got big plans ahead – and will continue disrupting the status quo in the domain industry. For now, we’re all heads down and working hard to create a safe, thriving domain – a place where big ideas are being brought to life every day. You can see lots of examples on our website at http://www.go.co.
We’re also doing some very interesting mining on our own data and should be able to start publishing more of our findings in the coming months. This is the kind of thing that really gets me excited – databases, cool Excel pivot tables, and watching our numbers grow.”
Thanks Nicolai lets catch up after year three.
Our congrats go out to the .Co team including Juan, Lori Ann and Crystal.
Joe says
Nice article, Mike. Congrats to the folks at CoInternet
TimCook8 says
http://www.chamisa.co is proud to be on a .co and is now headed to DC for the Fall term at Founder Institute which BTW is http://www.fi.co!
Mike Mann says
Sign me up for one of the flying pigs on the infographic. WRT: .Co you should use it as a baseline to estimate potential success of new TLDs; the new ones arent as good for the most part, arent in line first, will all be diluted by each other, not marketed or invested in as well as .Co, not any smarter than people at .Co, have to deal with lawsuits, scams, technology, maintenance etc .Also .Co will have speculative deletions and more competition so its baseline will lower also. So what are estimates for the new ones?
Michael Berkens says
Mike you don’t have to have over 1M registrations to be very profitable especially if you have 30+ new TLD’s
Lets say you have 50 TLD and each has a VERY modest 20K registrations that’s 1M per year at $20 wholesale $20M a year ongoing , recurring with not a lot of fixed costs
But 20K is really low, hell .Tel has hundreds of thousands of registrations, so lets say you have 50 apps and do on average 50K registrations.
Now your at 50 TLD x50K each at $20 wholesale that’s 2.5 million registrations or $50 Million a year, ongoing, year after year for the rest of your life
You should have went in to this one at least as heavy as Frank or Directi
John McCormac says
Well the real indication of .co’s health, from a user point of view, will be development. Targeting startups is an innovative marketing strategy but the backbone of a TLD is formed by the small businesses, the Mom and Pop operations, who develop the bulk of the sites. Without a primary market where development takes place, a secondary market doesn’t really exist and it might be more accurate to consider it, still, as a highly speculative market. The .com typo nature of .co has led to a higher than usual level of brand protection registrations and .co may be at risk of becoming a gateway TLD where more domains forward to sites in other TLDs than are developed in the TLD itself. However a high percentage, possibly 50% or so of .co domains may be PPC parked or on holding pages. COInternet really needs to target the small business demographic to drive development and build visibility.
@Mike Mann A baseline for a registry success but not necessarily for end users. That will take a while yet. It may be dependent on the targeted starups becoming the next Google or Facebook to drive development.
Rick Schwartz says
“For domain names acquired after GA, the blended rate of renewal is 62%, which includes the average of first and second time renewals.”
Numbers with a twist? What does “Blended” mean? Don’t like adjectives with numbers. Does that include the 97% and 92% above?
The happy face says that 38% do not renew. 38% is a HUGE number!
But if you take out the word “Blended” then that number by definition, shoots up. Just a matter of how much.
I think we can guess that 50% is a more likely number. That’s poor.
If you lose 50% of your registrations that is not a good indication. I don’t even think .mobi had 50% loss.
The more interesting number would be “Total traffic leaked from .co to .com”
Of course that info they don’t have, but I can say with a fair amount of certainty that it is somewhere between 35%-65%. Building a foundation on SAND is the single biggest flaw I see with .co. and 50% saw that.
Emma says
The way Rick Schwartz is saying about the traffic leak from .co to .com is as if the the far majority of traffic to websites is type-in traffic. You can clearly see that Rick Schwartz prays to god everyday so .co does not dilute the value of .com domains, which he owns. He is feeding hope by unconsciously or consciously skewing his own conscience. The fact that he even compared .mobi to .co, saying that he does not believe .mobi has a loss of more than 50% of its traffic but that .co does have a loss of more than 50% of its traffic to .com it reinforces the logic that Rick is consciously or unconsciously unfair as he owns thousands of .mobi domains. Rick should start being realist by asking himself the following questions: What is Google, Yahoo, Ask, Bing for? How does just Google alone make 25 to 30 billions Dollars revenue a year? Rick said that .co registry does not have the information about how much traffic .co domains lose to .com domains. However, Rick himself does not have the information about the percentage of the traffic that is type-in and the percentage of the traffic that websites get through search engines. .co can only lose some type-in traffic to .com. It will not lose any traffic that come through search engines because .co is recognizable and credible. So where did you come up with 35% to 65% traffic loss? Explain, what type of traffic is that?
Michael Berkens says
Rick
I think your reading the numbers wrong
For one .Co had just over 1.1 million registrations after the 1st renewal year now they have 1.35 so the total registration base has increased.
Second the blended rate of 62% renewal is from the 1st year taking into account grandfathered, land rush, all of those that are separated out
The renewal rate from for 2nd time renewals is 72%
.Com historically 72%-73%
Now what I asked and didn’t get an answer to and maybe they just don’t have the number, is how many dropped domains get re-registered through backorder or just re-registered after they drop.
We all know that dropping .com domains get re-registered, but they aren’t counted as renewed domains but dropped domains
Bottom line as long as there are more registrations at a registry in one year than the year before its growing.
Domo Sapiens says
How many are domains that were registered “knowingly or unknowingly” for 2 or more years originally ?
Mike says
So it looks like we will never know who would have won a free ticket to TRAFFIC – http://www.ricksblog.com/my_weblog/2012/08/win-a-free-ticket-to-traffic-guess-how-many-co-domains-drop.html
Nicolai, you are going to deny some poor soul a free ticket to the TRAFFIC conference? say it aint so!
Michael Berkens says
So I have never seen a registry issue the number of domains dropped in a year or quarter,
Even VeriSign which issues a quarterly report doesn’t says how many ,com drop
All you get is the renewal rate & number of total registrations
So not sure why or how he thought was going to get that number
All we know is there more .co domains now than after year 1
Rich says
Emma@
You hit the nail on the head.Very good points.