ICANN made the announcement overnight that batching will start on June 8th just after midnight UTC time and close right before midnight June 28th UTC time.
The results of batching will be released on July 11, 2012, all times and dates are “target” dates and therefore could be changed.
ICANN is moving forward with its Digital Archery Program for batching will be done assigning a secondary timestamp to each application using the TAS system.
Thee are two companies that have announced programs to increase the changes of getting into the top batches, one is run by Pool.com and one by a new player Digital Archery Services, both charge only upon success.
Digital Archery is similar to drop catching a domain, technology, connection speed and in this case location will all play a part.
Those who go with one of these services should have a much better chance of getting a 1st batch placement like back ordering a domain from one of the drop catches would give you a better change of registering a dropping domain on your own.
Here is the ICANN release:
“”Given the large number of new generic top-level domain (gTLD) applications, we will divide and evaluate them in batches. The batching system is targeted to open at 00:01 UTC on 8 June 2012, and will close at 23:59 UTC on 28 June 2012. The target date for posting the batching order is 11 July 2012.”
The batching process will be used to determine which applications will be processed in the first batch, the second batch and so on.
“It will be done by: assignment of a timestamp, and the formation of batches.”
Timestamp assignments will be done using the TLD Application System (TAS). All applicants must use their TAS credentials to log in, read and accept the batching rules, indicate their batching preference, and select their target date and time. Once these steps are completed applicants should log back into TAS to hit the target time and generate a secondary timestamp. Users will have access to a testing feature to gauge the secondary timestamp system’s response time.
Batching formation considers an applicant’s: (1) batching preference, (2) geographic region and secondary timestamp; and (3) contention among identical and “similar” applications.
(1) Applicants stating a preference for “opting-out” will be placed last.
(2) Geographic diversity is important in bringing more competition and choice into the domain name market. Applicants who opted in will be ranked within their geographic region (Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America/Caribbean and North America) by their secondary timestamp score. Then applications will be selected from each ICANN region using a “round robin” approach. This approach selects the best timestamp score from each region, one region at a time, on a rotating basis. If a region runs out of opted-in applications, the “round robin” continues across the remaining regions. This process continues until the batch is formed, with the opted-out applications last.
(3) ICANN will then make preliminary determinations of contention sets based upon exact match. All applications in a single contention set are placed into the batch where the earliest application in the contention set is placed. Once the string similarity panel establishes complete contention sets, “similar” strings might be reassigned to an earlier batch. No applications will be demoted as a result of the promotion of others. This could result in a batch larger than 500.
ICANN has taken care to provide a secure and stable platform for the batching system. Users will connect to the Citrix XenApp high-availability cluster and will then log into the batching system. Applicants will be required to agree to a set of Batching Rules, including an agreement that “ICANN reserves the right to delay an application to the last batch or to reject an application entirely if ICANN reasonably determines that the applicant abused the batching system or intentionally interfered with the performance of the system or any other applicant’s use of the system.”
Along with this announcement ICANN is posting several additional resources to inform applicants about the batching process. These include a: set of frequently asked questions (FAQs), video demonstration, user guide, batching details and rules, and a batching basics fact sheet, which all can be found on the Batching information webpage .”
Colin Campbell says
Why .Club chose to partner with DigitalArcheryExperts.com?
Quite frankly for us there is too much is at stake for .Club to wait.
Although a niche top level domain that is not expected to generate a lot of domains compared to some of the “big ones”, we have developed a platform to help clubs manage and run their online presence. After building the worlds number #1 wholesale platform at Hostopia we learned what it takes to truly put together a system that operates worldwide. We have invested a substantial sum in putting together our platform and believe that it is necessary for us to find the best possible solution to get us out sooner rather later.
We can handle the time frame Icann setup for the auction, but to delay our platform for another 2 or 3 years would be devastating to our team that have worked so hard on it. Putting together a solution for Digital Archery over the last few months has not been easy. Nor has it been cheap. It was for this reason that we decided to allow a limited number of other applicants to share in the first batch success.
Truth is, we have been overwhelmed with inquires from companies and organizations and I fear we will not be able to help everyone. For the life of me I can not understand why ICANN simply did not auction the spots or create another mechanism to handle this. This akin to a ship without enough life boats. Lets just hope that those companies that need to get launched find a way and those that don’t opt-out.
Colin Campbell
Chairman, CEO, .Club Domains, LLC.
Why did ICANN "design" such Limited Systems ? says
“can not understand why ICANN simply did not auction the spots or create another mechanism to handle this”
Why did ICANN “design” such Limited Systems ?
A: They have about 350,000,000 reasons, all summed up as Artificial Scarcity & CONTROL.
Anyone not getting at 100% Refund based on all the knowledge at this point is a….[INSERT Your Analysis]
M says
Is there any chance ICANN gets hit with legal action/an injunction before the batching starts ? Or has all the legal opposition we were hearing about throughout the last few months come to an end ?
"Is there any chance ICANN gets hit with legal action" says
“Is there any chance ICANN gets hit with legal action”
ICANN has built better paths than legal action into this version of their game.
Any Applicants who remain in the game will face years of playing (sitting) at the ICANN table.
Deep pockets will have no problem sitting doing nothing at the ICANN table
They pay the ICANN staff to play “process Games” all around for entertainment
Noobs will go broke and fade away sitting at the ICANN table
Insiders keep the charades going for relatively small annual budgets.
The smart money is well into their plan(s) which most people can not see or understand if they did have access.
99.99% of the world ignores ICANN and ISOC
Michael H. Berkens says
M
Well the batching process starts tomorrow so chances of getting hit with legal action before seems unlikely.
Not sure we are going to hear from groups that threatened action to stop the whole program
Most likely to sue is an applicant who winds up in the 4th batch realizing that there string may not get delegated until 2015 instead of 2013.
M says
@mhb
gotcha that makes sense. Stupid though, since the information about the process is readily available … arguing it after the batching will carry much less weight.