The Government Advisory Council (GAC) gave its report on the .XXX extension to the ICANN board this morning and it sounds like the ICANN board is getting ready to approve the .XXX extension in a vote over the GAC’s objection on Friday Morning.
Here is the statement of the GAC and the board from this morning’s session.
Read through it and see what you think:
“The GAC has prepared a statement of advice, and iIcan read that to the room now, and read it into the record.”
“There is no active support of the GAC for the introduction of the .XXX top-level domain.”
“While there are members which neither endorse nor oppose the introduction of the .XXX top-level domain, others are emphatically opposed from a public policy perspective to the introduction of a .XXX top-level domain.”
“Furthermore, the GAC would like to inform the ICANN board that an introduction of a .XXX top-level domain into the root might lead to steps taken by some governments to prohibit access to this TLD.
The GAC, therefore, calls the board’s attention to concerns expressed by experts that such steps bear a potential risk or threat to the universal resolvability and stability of the domain name system.”
“Moreover, the GAC does not consider the information provided by the board to have answered the GAC concerns as to whether the ICM application meets the sponsorship criteria.”
“The GAC further shares concerns expressed by others that with the revised proposed ICANN/ICM Registry agreement, the corporation could be moving towards assuming an ongoing management and oversight role regarding internet content, which could be inconsistent with its technical mandate.”
“The GAC looks forward to the board clarifying the basis for its 10th of December 2010 decision regarding .XXX.
“The GAC expects that this would include a response to the substantial objections received from the community and reference to ICANN’s role as a public benefit corporation”
“Thank you.”
ICANN responded as follows:
“These are extracts from the ICANN bylaws which, first of all, explains that governmental advisory committee advice on public policy matters shall be taken into account in the formulation and adoption of policies and we have no doubt that this provision — all those provisions apply.”
“And so we get to the next point, which is that in the event that the board is determining to take an action that’s not consistent with GAC advice, that we’re required to inform the gac and state the reasons why it decided not to.
“And so we’ve done that in this case in relation to the materials of the 28th of October, and then a board resolution in cartagena which we’ve referred to previously as triggering the bylaws, which is the one that announced that we intended to take an action that appeared to be inconsistent, and then there was a letter to the gac setting out further details of that.”
“And then — and we’ve been doing that really since cartagena in some ways that we’re required then to meet, et cetera, to try in good faith and in a timely and efficient manner to find a mutually acceptable solution.”
“So this discussion today is really a further continuation of that process, as we try and find a mutually acceptable solution.”
“We’ve been happy with the process. we’re happy with the — grateful that we’ve received clarification from the GAC, including further materials received today which help us as we try to find this mutually acceptable solution. thank you.”
“If we then move from here, if we can’t find the acceptable solution, then the board is required to state in its final decision the reasons why advice was not followed without prejudice to other things the gac may wish to do.”
“So certainly if we do find ourselves moving inconsistent with GAC advice, we will be responding and addressing the matters raised in the public comment and in the GAC advice as we are required to.”
“The next step will be for the Board to make its decision and either accept the GAC advice or, if it differs, and anywhere it differs, to comply with the obligation, to explain why in writing.”
“This is something that’s on the Board’s agenda for tomorrow, and it means then that the Board has some hard work to do today and tomorrow to be ready for that vote.”
“thank you very much.”
So all this means is it all comes down to the vote of he ICANN Board when they meet at 10am PST tomorrow and we will be there to cover it live for you.
page howe says
concerns expressed by experts that such steps bear a potential risk or threat to the universal resolvability and stability of the domain name system.
so the GAC is saying if you approve, and then root splinters, then you did and that shows you can govern.
is ICANN ready to risk itself for .XXX, in the past icann just asked for indemnity… and im sure the applicant would do it, but they cant indemnify ICANN against losing its power over the root.
page howe says
should be can’t govern
jp says
So some countries block the tld. That’s their business. There is no requirement for any country to support any extension. What a pointless what if.
Gac is silly if they think icann will explain their reasoning for anything. If they think they will get an explanation then I am seriously concerned about the intelligence of these people who are allegedly important for the Internet.
TheBigLieSociety says
“is ICANN ready to risk itself for .XXX”?
—-
Very good question.
Uncle Sam certainly has ICANN between the old Rock and a HARD Place.
The only thing that may cause the Board to toss caution to the wind is the realization that they are not part of any future planning. There is wide-spread
consensus on that.
Landon White says
@ Biglie
The only thing that may cause the Board to toss caution to the wind is the realization that they are not part of any future planning. There is wide-spread
consensus on that.
—
In other words …
This will be revenge for easing ICANN out of the future Internet picture.
if so …
It can be “reversed” as ICANN,
HAS PROVEN REPEATEDLY TO BE ‘NOT OF MATURE JUDGMENT”
Landon White says
In a couple hours money grubbing ICANN will decide if Adult Website
owners will be part of the new online government fascist regime program.
–
as Stuart Lawley the CEO of .XXX so nicely put it …
–
– ICM will not decide what is appropriate Adult content …
–
(quote) Law enforcement will decide what is legal or offensive” (unquote)
TheBigLieSociety says
“This will be revenge for easing ICANN out of the future Internet picture”
—————-
It will be hard for any company (bloated or not) to compete with FREE domains.
People seem to have already forgotten when Microsoft entered the browser business and asked NetScape. “What part of FREE don’t you understand?”
The U.S. Department of .COMmerce is going to have to justify a Gold Plated IANA Contract with a Multi-Level-Marketing MLM cartel that abuses the Non-Profit structure of America’s legal system.