USA TODAY’S 23rd annual exclusive Ad Meter just came out for the Super Bowl commercials and it looks like Doritos came out the big winner.
The winner featured a guy who teases a hungry pug dog with Doritos that was made by a 31-year-old part-time designer of websites for kids for about $500.
A Bud Light ad featuring a dog sitter who gets the canines to cater his party tied for the top spot.
“The No. 3 spot for VW’s Passat, and a kid in a Darth Vader costume”
As far as Godaddy ranking they did not fair well although the .Co commercial with Joan Rivers scored well above the Danica Patrick, Jillian Michaels commercial which finished as the 3rd least popular.
As far as Internet company’s CareerBuilder.com got the best ranking.
Just having Joan Rivers in the commercial shows just how much of a joke .co is
Joan Rivers is the new .co girl yea right, The Go daddy Commercials were a joke.
the godaddy commercials were THE WORST superbowl commercials I have seen in a long time. Joan Rivers, come on…what is Bob smoking?
I will leave my personal opinion out of this, but I had some (non-industry) friends over and they all had the same reaction,”DotCom is about hot babes and dotco is about older women? Don’t get it.” They all know who Joan Rivers is and thought the commercial was a spoof by GoDaddy trying to put down dotCo. I quickly informed them that was NOT the case 🙂
“They all know who Joan Rivers is and thought the commercial was a spoof by GoDaddy trying to put down dotCo.”
=====
Interesting how people interpret commercials, humor and communication in general. People assume ALL people will see it the way they see it.
Assume = ASS.U.ME
Did those Pepsi ads make it look like blacks run from a crime scene?
If Obama was born in Kenya, why didn’t Bill O’Reilly ask him about that ?
“They all know who Joan Rivers is and thought the commercial was a spoof by GoDaddy trying to put down dotCo. I quickly informed them that was NOT the case”
That pretty much says it all, not only was it a flop at delivering a simple message but it managed to make .co look stupid at the same time.
aka – a WASTED .opportunity
Hi,
I missed the “.CO”…glad I did now, I will not even watch it online. The “.Com” spot…for a lack of a better word, ‘sucked’.
It is to bad “Bob” can not come up with good a 30 sec spot for his company.
His obsession with the fact that, his commercials have to be Girls half or fully nude…has always been a problem. Over the years he has had more rejected commercials than any other advertiser. A few years ago, they had to reject his commercial 7 times, before they accepted one.
I think the big winner was: Facebook/????. com
Which brings me to something I have never understood and never will. I do not know the exact $ amount of what a 30 sec spot went for this year…I think it was around: $ 3 million….
Now, If I was the owner of say ‘The domains”…and I am going to put up this kind of money for a 30 sec spot.
You better beleive, during the entire 30 sec spot, I am going to have the ‘URL”, TheDomains .com somewhere on the screen for the entire 3o seconds of the commercial.
Yet, to this day… Everyone that spends this kind of money, has their domain name destination…in the “last frame” of the commercial only… and it is only shown for: 1/2 to maybe 2 seconds at the most.
Has never made much sense to me…and never will. IMHO
Best,
Dan
Esentially, you will see what you want to see. If .com is the sexy extension, then .co is the all business extension. It is funny how people perceive things. It wouldn’t have mattered if the .co girl was the sexiest in the world, the detractors would have nixed it. Minds were made up long before. So what’s the difference, really.
I don’t think some people like this choice because she is more mainstream than any other Godaddy representatives heretofore. There are many women who want to be taken seriously, as entrepreneurs, who have disdained the other Godaddy approaches. So? Women dictate a lot more of the market than is generally perceived. Are people afraid of a mature female figure? Ask your mother, you might get an interesting reply.
Who has more influence? Warner Bros. or an independent movie studio? If you’re an indie, it’s clear. In terms of mainstream, it’s pretty clear, Warner Bros.
“You better beleive, during the entire 30 sec spot, I am going to have the ‘URL”, TheDomains .com somewhere on the screen for the entire 3o seconds of the commercial.”
====
CHATTER.COM followed your approach SalesForce.com is a force.
Got this response from my GD rep to my questions about if they will ever reduce the rate.
“I don’t envision the registration or renewal rate of the .CO extension changing anytime in the near future. The registry is doing a good job in helping to maintain the credibility of the TLD by keeping the rates high.
I would expect the rates to stay around the $25-30 range.”
BTW: He is a great rep. – I’m only posting this with his ID removed so that you could see that the .CO reduced rate is like what .info was at .99 cents. You’ll pay dearly later…
@Em
If dot co is the all business then they should have got Donald Trump to endorse it. That would have been a spoof with impact. Joan is a joke who didn’t deliver credibility or anything appealing. It is almost as if the ad was meant to be a joke for domainers.
This is why Godaddy and the .CO folks are laughing all the way to the bank. Watch the interview that pops up on the left.
http://www.accesshollywood.com/joan-rivers-blasts-her-super-bowl-godaddy-girl-haters_article_43413
That’s the first thing you get when you search for “Joan Rivers” on G.
It really doesn’t matter if you liked the ad or not… they are generating crazy page views. Probably more than any other commercial. She’s been all over national TV today.
Brilliant marketing! Like it or not.
Hi “TBLS”….
Good point…. I guess “1” doing it correctly out of “61” (if I counted correctly) is not bad of a ratio. 🙂
So I guess I will have to give:
CHATTER .COM & Facebook/???
As being the two winners… as far as domain name advertising in this years Superbowl.
Peace!
Dan
Biglie is a bigidiot. Maybe get yourself a big glass of water, sit down and take it easy. I think you are dehydrated, and your blood has gotten to thick to travel to your brain, and that’s why you keep saying all this stupid sh!t.
The big winner? FOX $108MM in advertising during the game ($3MM per 30 sec)
The Biggest loser? BEP. Can’t mask poor singing and musical talent with “Performance” Weak!
NOTICE:
Roses are Red violets are blue …
.Co is ONLY good if some secret …
Registrar Promo Commission BUY’S YOU!
Ask your self …
“Who’s Corporate Cubicle do YOU Whore for”
Serious proposal.
We all have interests away from domain names, most of us are members of forums unrelated to tech.
Go to one of these forums and without mentioning specifics related to .co or anything else, ask non-domainers and non tech types to give their thoughts on the Godaddy commercial. You will soon realize it’s 180 degrees away from what the domainer-hive has been buzzing about.
Schwartz is nuts-on-the-money with the whole “See John Jones…” thing.
I love word play.
“the .Co commercial with Joan Rivers scored well above the Danica Patrick, Jillian Michaels commercial”
I am not sure 53rd to 60th falls in the category of “well above”
Keep the faith .co dreamers and advertising partners.
Hi,
Even though I put, facebook .com/???? as one of the two winners in the domain advertising for this years ‘SB’.
I will be dammed if I can remember anything that came after the “/” of all of them.
That being said, facebook .com/??? still a winner…as it was in 5- 8 or so commercials and ‘FB’ did not have to pay a ‘penny’…. for the extra PR.
I thought the: Kim Kardashian was a good one, but I have no idea what came after the “/”
She should have bought the: .com domain name of her product or company she was advertising….had it on every frame of the 30 second’s… with just the “FB” logo next to it…to let people know the could go to either place or both.
Again, just IMHO…. 🙂
Best,
Dan
Godaddy SHUT DOWN premium .CO aftermarket during Game:
(Great Ethics,huh, you cant even dump em and flush the toilet)
The Commercial was a FLOP!
(BOTH Commercials right at the bottom of the Official Network TV Survey)
Shutting Down Premium was a COVER to explain why there
was NO sales.
Real Reason: Godaddy had NO increase in Traffic…
This .Co thing is TURNING every one into a CON!
@Landon
Your obvious put downs are getting a bit old.
The commercial was great.
.CO is great
Long live the new KING!
@
Jeff Schneider
Right on the Button!
The lunatics are running the Institution and it looks like they have
stopped taking there hallucination medicine.
I think why the Media is printing the .Co gibberish is they are being sent
the hype by the bundle and are using it as filler on slow news days,
NOT that they even know what there reporting on, or know it all BS.
I think the .Co bull has reached a head and now with this …
Godaddy BIG failure it will be on life support.
WAIT!
Its is already on life support just listen to the frantic pleas of
the desperate .Co owners, who think that dreaming will increase the value
of “something that has no value” except in the deluded minds of the
.CO mental masterbators like Robert Clown the Village blog IDIOT.
@ Robert Clown AKA Wannabe Idiot Domainer:
say, Clown a Domainer is someone who owns .Com’s of VALUE
A wannabe Domainer is a something who owns a .Co that has No VALUE!
say Clown seeing you like to type, get a job in the typing pool
cause that’s all you can do in a retarded way and make a fool of your self.
I see it with “Landon White” (roses are red…) and “Mike”
being ranked 53rd or 60th is the same as SEO – it only counts in the top 3 or 5 at the most.
It is not about .com – (oops .co) – it is iumply just bad ads.
The Bud ad but promoting .co would have drawn in 10’s of thousands of first time .co suckers – when they realize they got sold a bill of goods – they would have called on the .com owners – so for those that sell .com’s for a living – you are the biggest loaser here.
Maybe NASCAR next – I like the motivation behind the .co guys – but not by getting Bob Parsons to discount .co’s 60% to $11.99 and blow several mils.
@Landon White
Please be quiet.
You are sounding just as ridiculous as Robert Cline, and your reptitive commentary is probably doing more harm than good to your own personal vendetta against .cos.
Any advertising is good advertising and this mantra might be applied as much to your monotonous diatribe as to the Jane Rivers add.
Personally I don’t think one advertisement is going to make or break the extension, and while everyone is entitled to their opinion, the need to scroll through pages of comments from yourself and Robert is getting tiring…
Like Rick said, the numbers don’t lie. Techcrunch, Hulu, Msn, etc, declared it one of the worst Super Bowl ads. It was a terrible choice for a spokesperson and the commercial was executed very amateurishly.
BrianWick
I see it with “Landon White” (roses are red…) and “Mike”
being ranked 53rd or 60th is the same as SEO – it only counts in the top 3 or 5 at the most.
————————
Yes, as the Headline Banner of this thread reads
“Godaddy the Loser” (Means .Co the Loser)
i agree the PUBLIC could care less about .Co
(it was a last ditch desperate try to validate this typo extension)
THE PUBLIC HAS SPOKEN AND REJECTED .Co
THEY ARE VERY HAPPY WITH .COM
Motorcycle Bob Parsons makes out like a Bandit and is having fun at the .Co Newbie peasants expense.
Goddady Nets around $400MM a year, registers a Domain every 7 secs,
makes $9 profit on a .Co registration, versus around 99 cents for .Co.etc
@ observer aka Peanut Gallery
What have you added in the way of contribution to this Blog ,
try being a “participant” instead
of being a “observer” sitting on your Big Fat Butt wanking in the dark.
we can’t call the GoDaddy ad “loser” since only a very small number of people that watch TV are domainers
the same would happen if you try to advertise rockets in TV 🙂
anyhow, the success or fias.CO of the GoDaddy ad, can be easily “calculated” at the end of this week when we will know how many $11.99 .CO domains have been sold by GoDaddy and by other registrars
As Level Headed Domainers Lets turn all the Negative Talk about The .Co Extension and Turn it into something Positive. Somebody needs to lead this .Co Extension into Main Stream Society in an Uplifting and Positive Way. Joan Started it and Now we need to Continue to Promote it in a Good Light. As Joan Would Say,,” Can We Talk?” So I registered these Names to Help Promote the Extension.
Canwetalk.Co
Asseenon.Co
JoinNow.Co
Openingsoon.Co
Im offering these Domains to anyone interested in POSITIVE PROMOTING of the .Co Extension. Lets be Clear I am not Just Trying to sell them for benefit, I really think these Names Could Open Some Eyes To The .Co and By me holding onto them would be a waste when someone could do WONDERS with them.
Best Regards
Hi,
The only think I could figure out what was best for this .CO domain extension…was:
“Colorado”
Thought came to late…as I went through a large list of almost every city/town in “CO”…from Denver down to a town with just over 3k in population…
Every city/town .CO was taken…
Other than that, it is just another… .info, .biz ….imho ~ It will not even reach .net ‘status’.
( no offense attend towards anyone that owns any .net domain name asset(s) )
Full disclosure..I own “1” .co
Peace!
Dan
BTW: “source” ~ GL
Blah blah blah
All you few on this board think you know it all.
The fact of the matter is that 30 second commercial planted a seed.
And an effective one at that.
One month from now, people will still remember Joan Rivers ad.
People sometimes like medicine do not know what is for their own good.
And idiot juvenile London thinks just because there wasn’t a hot playboy bunny rabbit that it was a bust.
Not so. I am an expert in marketing and I call tell you for a fact that Joan left an indelible mark in everyone’s memory.
3 months from now when go to register the domain they want and it is taken, they’ll remember the ad and say, how about in .CO
Hi Robert,
I hope “Joan” lives to be 150+ years old….and wish her a happy and healthy life.
But it might be a “toss up” who goes first… .CO or Joan
Peace!
Dan
@Robert Cline
“I am an expert in marketing ”
Great – anybody that is an expert at marketing and has the budget can put quotes around anything like “XYZ.co”, “XYX.cc” or XYZ.robertcline” and put it on a billboard, TV and other trational meda sources.
But for folks like me who consider several mils a lot of money – I have to rely on the intuitive, self-promoting, self advertising brand of the Intenet – i.e. the .com.
Sorry friends – I am clearly not rich (and stupid) like this. So I am stuck in the mud with .com – very sad – yes ?
@Dan
But it might be a “toss up” who goes first… .CO or Joan
——–
The Best Ever! ~ Love it …
LOL
——————————
@ Robert Clown
“I am an expert in marketing ”
———————————–
Who dont own any .Com’s
HILARIOUS!
lol
Brian,
Sad? no 😉
That is not “mud” your stuck in…. Its “black gold”!
Best,
Dan
I get it, we got 3 or 4 posters who didn’t buy any .CO s and are now happy that they didn’t see a pretty 19 yr old.
Misery loves company, idiots.
We’ll see who gets the last laugh.
Just to let you know as we speak, it looks like all the LLL.CO s are just about gone. I been keeping track and today many people registered the remaining LLL.CO s.
There is a difference between the vast majority of 100,000,000 people that buy 1 or 2 domains for their business, they don’t mine getting a
greatdomain.CO
whereas you idiots who lost all your money in the stock market don’t want others doing well.
That is why you toil and spend all your energy trying to poopooh other people’s success
including my success
Hi Robert,
” I get it, we got 3 or 4 posters who didn’t buy any .CO s and are now happy that they didn’t see a pretty 19 yr old.”
Just for the record, I went with one main choice and a back up…
#1Rachel Welch (70)
#2.Betty White (89)
I guess they were not quite “Iconic” or old enough…
Peace!
Dan
BTW: I do own ‘1’ .CO & it is not: 1.CO 🙂
Just bought:
TFJ.CO
Will develop a site pertaining to
The Family Journal
It also has 2 premium letters.
Hi Friends,
There is a lot of frustration here – and as I have said before – I do no not make the rules – and at a lot of my expense – I simply play by the rules set forth my UDRP , ACPA and every other court / jurisdiction on the planet = the .com is the only one on the shelf – and to change that funds greater than TARP and any other trillion dollar bail out package would be be needed to change what has been programmed into the minds of world consumers by the courts and UDRP panels.
Friends – put all your resources into a “Court Created” .com and make a bunch of dough.
Done.
Best,
@BrianWick
Did you know that 85% of .com s are undeveloped.
Hi Robert Cline,
I respect your frustration.
Lets just say I own 100,000 feet of beach front property somewhere – very nice and it just sits empty with a popsicle stand and the wild birds coming in and out at their own pleasure (i.e. undeveloped) – does that mean that the property is worthless when tire-kickers call regularily and tell me that.
Your logic is distorted – dont get burned too bad friend
@Robert Cline
You’re a very prolific poster who uses an alias – so why would you reveal your identity by posting your last dotCo purchase?
Hi David,
Great “Geo domain portfolio” you and your brother have. Well, maybe the best in the world…that I know of.
So, it is going to bring out of me the only .CO I own…I reg it, because it was to easy not to. Should be in the ‘news’ for many years…especially if the ‘political’ landscape changes in 2012.
anwr .co
Best,
Dan
btw:
“Robert” I hope this calms you down a bit….I do own a ‘.Co’ 😉
Just too much….
I never saw the .CO spot… But this makes it even more…well now…INSANE!
“Quote”
FIRST PUBLISHED: February 7, 2011 3:16 PM EST
LOS ANGELES, Calif. —
Joan Rivers made her debut as GoDaddy.co’s new spokeswoman in a commercial during Sunday night’s Super Bowl and the comedy legend is already feeling the heat!
”[There’s been an] amazing reaction,” Joan told Access Hollywood Live’s Billy Bush and Kit Hoover when asked about the spot that features the 77-year-old’s head on the body of 25-year-old actress/model Tabitha Taylor.
‘End Quote”
—
They could not even use all of “Joan Rivers” ….. So “freaking backwards”
At least my top two choices… would have never let them do this…
Everything about ‘Joan’ is either bought or sold…
I am done….
Peace To All!
Dan
GoDaddy Ad Spend: $3,000,000/commercial divided by $11.99/dotCO domain = 250,208 domains x 2 commercials = 500,417 domains to break even (doesn’t count any add-on’s; email, hosting,etc.)
Whether people liked the tv commercial or not, it is doing its job. Even on this article alone, there are 2 sides of the coin. People and the news giving opinions whether its good they used Joan Rivers or not. Whether they like .co or not.
This is exactly how Go Daddy intended it to be. If they used the normal sexy women like Megan Fox, etc, it wont stand out from any other TV Commercials.
It now becomes either smart, silly, or stupid. It all depends on how you look at it.
Whether it is good or bad publicity. It is still publicity. And it will certainly stay in people’s minds. Which is the main purpose of a tv commercial.
Has anyone released the figures (not as a %) to see how many new .co’s have been registered since the Superbowl ad ?
It should give “some indication” of if the ad was successful or not at promoting .co
NO ANSWER FROM …
JAMES KIM alias ROBERT CLINE
DUMB DE DUMB DUMB ….
Thought the GoDaddy.co ad was stupid and lame. Might just be because I don’t get American humour or style being an Aussie but it really was quite terrible IMO.
Go Daddy ads were disgusting and in poor taste. Par for the course.
shouldn’t .co be a non-issue?
Creativity doesn’t have to cost the earth. Frito Lay spent millions on their advertising, but the $500 ‘crash the super bowl’ winning entry from JD Burningham was at least as well received as the much more expensive offerings. How was this possible? Crowdsourcing.
CHECK OUT OUR BLOG
http://blur-designs.com/blog/the-true-cost-of-creativity-in-the-crowd-500-according-to-this-super-bowl-ad/
There is one thing being overlooked here however; the Godaddy commercial had a strong incentive to drive visitors to their website. I thought that was pretty smart.
I liked this one better than the others.
“Not so. I am an expert in marketing and I call tell you for a fact that Joan left an indelible mark in everyone’s memory.”
@Robert (expert in marketing)
That’s the problem, it was .co’s chance to leave an indelible mark in everyone’s memory…not Joans
UNLESS the additional .co reg numbers due to the ad prove otherwise then it may not have worked out as intended – but nobody seems very forthcoming with those figures as of yet.
..yes, I know its early days 🙂
..they should be hitting the 1,000,000 mark about…wait for it…wait for it…
now!
why does it matter?
will it make you behave differently?
The Joan Rivers ad is gaining some traction in the MSM – perhaps it will have a more positive impact that most, including myself, initially thought.
Regards,
TBC
The Social-TV-Network
http://www.Soc.TV
The Joan Rivers ad is gaining some traction in the MSM – perhaps it will have a more positive impact that most, including myself, initially thought.
Regards,
TBC
The Social-TV-Network
Soc.TV
Yes if you want to win awards godaddy didn’t win, but I bet they got new customers. Plus domainers may have also taken advantage of their promotion.
Yet – as someone else mentioned before Name.com has your .co’s for $7.77
ccTLD’s are a-rockin – these sales are from last week (From DNJournal):
Soc.io sold for $2500 – site is up.
Jamaica.nl sold for $12,455 – site is up.
Work.io sold for $4,500
TechZone.in sold for $3,975
LuxuryEstate.it sold for $2,740
What’s my point? If the above, obscure ccTLD’s are selling at these prices, .co will do very well considering the marketing dollars behind it.
– TBC
HI,
“The Verdict Is in: Super Bowl’s Best-Liked and Most-Recalled Ads”
http://adage.com/superbowl/article?article_id=148756
____
Peace!
Dan
“You cannot buy a single LLL.CO anymore. This makes me extremely sad to think that I cannot buy another LLL.CO.
What are your thoughts on this matter?
”
Get in fast- get out faster.
its is .cc all over again friends
It’s the morning after. The blogosphere is abuzz with excitement about Super Bowl Sunday, and EnCirca is tickled to join in and offer special pricing for registering a dot-co domain. EnCirca’s promotional pricing for a dot-co registration is $11.99 for the first year and will be available until Friday, February 11, 2011. Dot-co, an old domain name, has reinvented itself and is now available for unrestricted international use.
The explosive rise of dot-co as a popular domain is in large part because many businesses have brands and trademarks that they would like to register but have been taken in .com. But, even big businesses like Twitter and Overstock.com have gotten in on the deal and have become early dot-co adopters.
“There have been over 600,000 dot-co registrations in less than a year,” says Tom Barrett, President of EnCirca. “Names are going fast and businesses should protect their brands and trademarks.”
The suffix dot-co is universally recognized as an abbreviation for company. In a dot-co registry survey, 75 percent of respondents equated dot-co with “company,” “corporation,” or “commerce.” In fact, nearly 50 countries use dot-co as a second-level domain name to depict just that, such as co.uk and co.jp.
Going price on LLL.CO is $15,000
BMR.CO sold for $15,000
Whatever naysayers say, the stats and numbers speak for themselves.
LLL. CO
all gone in less than 24 hours after the super bowl.
Just incredible
Sad but very newsworthy
I believe LLL.CO valuations are now going to go through the roof.
Would not be surprised to see $100,000 sale within the year.
Robert
I understand that you are saying all 3 letter .co are gone.
You don’t have to post another comment on it every 15 minutes.
The Sedo .Co auction starts tomorrow where some of the best .Co domains on the planet are in.
We will see what happens
Hi Robert,
“MHB”… ask you nicely not to keep posting about the ??? .CO domains…being taken.
‘Everyone else here thinks it is a big deal’?
Your looking at the wrong poll numbers…
Peace!
Dan
BTW: please do not reply to my post…. for the love of ‘god .co’
@ Robert
LLL are the first things domainers target.
There are LLL sellouts in other secondary extensions like US/BIZ. It doesn’t mean virtually anything for their reseller value though.
Brad
Robert
Not every three letter .Co is registered.
There are many that are not registered yet not reserved such as net.co.
I ran the full database a month or so ago and found several hundred of the letter domains in this state of limbo.
I asked the .Co registry about these and the answer I got where these are domains that we in a landrush auction but did not complete for non-payment.
So technically since I know for a fact there are quite a few of these out there I couldn’t say they are taken, just unavailable.
@MHB
There are few LLL.CO s that are reserved by the registry which are basically super premiums that will go for $1Million plus but the
rest have now been registered in full.
This is huge news that
must be reported IMHO.
Robert
There is a difference between a reserved domain like Lol.co and those that are just not allocated like net.co
You can see the difference if you do a true whois:
LOL.co:
Domain Name: LOL.CO
Domain ID: D724046-CO
Sponsoring Registrar: RESTRICTED AND RESERVED NAMES .COINTERNET
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 672943168
Registrar URL (registration services): http://www.cointernet.com.co
Domain Status: serverTransferProhibited
Registrant ID: RESERVEDNAME
Registrant Name: Restricted and Reserved Names .CO Internet SAS
Registrant Organization: .CO Internet S.A.S.
Registrant Address1: Calle 100# 8a-49 Torre B Oficina 507
Registrant City: Bogota
Registrant Postal Code: 0000
Registrant Country: Colombia
Registrant Country Code: CO
Registrant Phone Number: +571.6169916
Registrant Email: premium@cointernet.co
Administrative Contact ID: RESERVEDNAME
Administrative Contact Name: Restricted and Reserved Names .CO Internet SAS
Administrative Contact Organization: .CO Internet S.A.S.
Administrative Contact Address1: Calle 100# 8a-49 Torre B Oficina 507
Administrative Contact City: Bogota
Administrative Contact Postal Code: 0000
Administrative Contact Country: Colombia
Administrative Contact Country Code: CO
Administrative Contact Phone Number: +571.6169916
Administrative Contact Email: premium@cointernet.co
Billing Contact ID: RESERVEDNAME
Billing Contact Name: Restricted and Reserved Names .CO Internet SAS
Billing Contact Organization: .CO Internet S.A.S.
Billing Contact Address1: Calle 100# 8a-49 Torre B Oficina 507
Billing Contact City: Bogota
Billing Contact Postal Code: 0000
Billing Contact Country: Colombia
Billing Contact Country Code: CO
Billing Contact Phone Number: +571.6169916
Billing Contact Email: premium@cointernet.co
Technical Contact ID: RESERVEDNAME
Technical Contact Name: Restricted and Reserved Names .CO Internet SAS
Technical Contact Organization: .CO Internet S.A.S.
Technical Contact Address1: Calle 100# 8a-49 Torre B Oficina 507
Technical Contact City: Bogota
Technical Contact Postal Code: 0000
Technical Contact Country: Colombia
Technical Contact Country Code: CO
Technical Contact Phone Number: +571.6169916
Technical Contact Email: premium@cointernet.co
Net.co
com.co
Not found: com.co
@MHB
NET.CO
and
COM.CO
are specially designated extensions in themselves:
Like I registered BILL.COM.CO
You cannot consider these as ever being registerable. .CO has made them into extensions in their own right.
@ MHB
You asked this Robert Cline (found out yestereday to be James Kim
to stop posting over and over …
and yet he posted over and over a dozen times.
HE IS CHASING AWAY OTHER POSTERS,
WHO MIGHT HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY!
I HOPE YOU DIO NOT ALLOW HIM AND THIS BIG CHEESE ACTOR TO MAKE
YOUR BLOG A TURN INTO A INFO COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRY JOKE!
David
I’m trying to monitor the guy without blocking him for good as I hate to do that.
I do have a business to run and can’t watch him 24/7
We will see what happens
This is what I am talking about:
Is GoDaddy ushering in new internet era?
http://www.azfamily.com/video/featured-videos/Is-GoDaddy-ushering-in-new-internet-era-115536904.html
For all who think the GoDaddy commercial was crap:
Look at Alexa hot topics:
http://www.alexa.com/
Number One is godaddy.com
I think these guys know exactly what they do 😉