Another great generic domain and another seven figure sale, as Moniker.com tells me tonight the brokered the domain, Photo.com for $1.25 Million.
These bang on category killers are hard to beat and always seem to sell.
We congratulate the Seller and Buyer.
And it doesn’t suck for Moniker.com either.
just wondering says
Who was the seller?
Photos.com is owned Getty.
David J Castello says
Nice.
Brian says
nice one… was this the chef’s first brokering deal π
M. Menius says
Over 1 billion Google indexed pages for “photo” … beating out both “photos” and “photography”.
99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays says
.
the price seems TOO LOW to me
if the insurance-only insure.com has been sold for $16 million the REAL VALUE of the widely known and much more known and used word “photo” should be at least THREE TIMES HIGHER or $50 million and acquired by a BIG web or imaging company like Google or Microsoft or Canon etc.
.
Alan says
99% — insure.com was not a pure domain sale – It was a developed site and not just a domain name that was parked. Almost like saying if MTV.com sold for $100m why is NTV.com only worth $50k.
Not comparing apples to apples here.
99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays says
ok, Alan, but the price always seems too low for the very large potential market of a site based on photo.com
maybe, the right domain value is 5 or 10 million …that is very good for the buyier that acquired it for $1.25M
Alan says
Good domains always seem low after the sale. The name is worth between $7 and $7 billion – just depends on what price the owner was happy to sell and the buyer was happy to pay.
Personally, I would not waste 1.25m on this domain or anywhere close but for a Kodak or somebody sure, probably worth more. All relative and hard to guess. Ranges vary way too much in this industry due to the number of intangible factors associated with each domain.
The only right value is how much the domain is worth to the buyers business plan. If you are a domain owner then anything over $1m gets media attention and its good for all of us.
99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays says
yes, for Kodak, not for all
what’s better than a site like photo.com ?
MHB says
Guys
This domain was at the last TRAFFIC NY auction so it got some publicity then and I would guess Moniker has in preparation for the auction and ever since reached out to all the brands that you mentioned trying to broker the domain.
Afif says
Emm.. misspelling
Moniker.com tells me tonight the brokered the domain,
its the=they
chandan says
what a sale π
equipment hire says
nice sale, and a very nice purchase
i think was a fair deal, slightly erring to the buyer getting the best deal
Alan says
99%
“whatβs better than a site like photo.com ?”
A domain like photo.com has alternatives like photos.com, picture.com, pictures.com – thats exactly why 1.25 M was probably top value for this domain.
Whenever a name has alternatives that easily switched with words which are just as commonly used in the same language it dilutes the value of any of them being some crazy number as value.
I can name 1,000 names better than this such as insurance.com, health.com, love.com, realestate.com etcccc … so many which have no other words that define in such power the same category.
In addition, you have the singular plural effect – if photos.com sold for 1.25M I have a feeling your comments and feelings would be the exact same.
however if realestate(s).com, insurance(s).com, love(s).com, etc… sold for 1.25 anyone would think the buyer was an idiot.
A category killer word is great but just because its a single word doesn’t mean its the only category killer for that field. Single words are sort of a domainers thing – many two words beat single words anyday.
This name happened to get around 10,000 people a month according to compete which was probably a big part of the valuation.
99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays says
“A domain like photo.com has alternatives like photos.com, picture.com, pictures.com β thats exactly why 1.25 M was probably top value for this domain.”
but all them are already registered and the total number of photo related .com domains is just four
.
99% of the multi-billions users/multi-billion$ iPad/iPhone-like markets will use LCD displays says
however, I always register the singular and plural of a domain (when I find both, of course)
Fan de photo web says
I agree the price seems too low.
I really thought i would be like 5 to 10M$